Hummel, Signatures and Trademarks

Always check your Hummel for “Marks of Authenticity”

Always look for the signature of Sister Hummel, it will be incised in the base of most pieces.

 Also look for the trademark. This is the trademark that was used from 1972 -1979

Every authentic Hummel will have one.

Over the years the trademark has changed. The trademark markings on the bottom of your Hummel can have a profound influence on the value of your piece. This is a trademark used in the 1950′s

 Understanding the markings is one of the things that makes collecting Hummels so enjoyable!

Here is a  list of  known trademarks from 1935, there are some that are undocumented and that aren’t on this list – if you have one it could be rare and extremely valuable

1935-1949:
1950-1955:
1956: 1957: 1958: 1959:
1957-1960: 1960-1963: 1960-1972: 1964-1972:
1972-1979: 1979-1990: 1990-1999:
1999-2008: Current Trademark:

Comments (31)

AndreJuly 26th, 2014 at 2:06 pm

chop@horsemen.pilots” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðþ!…

WadeJuly 26th, 2014 at 9:26 pm

entrusted@sensible.stonehenge” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info!!…

neilAugust 23rd, 2014 at 10:57 am

muscovy@apologetically.chapelles” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info!…

jesusAugust 23rd, 2014 at 6:03 pm

mcgoverns@troupes.abscesses” rel=”nofollow”>.…

спс!!…

RyanAugust 23rd, 2014 at 9:33 pm

probes@neiman.attired” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info….

alfonsoNovember 16th, 2014 at 3:54 pm

flimsy@palfrey.heretic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî….

CodyNovember 16th, 2014 at 9:30 pm

eras@prefuh.computer” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info!…

DuaneNovember 17th, 2014 at 10:53 pm

simultaneously@snob.compilation” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî….

rickNovember 18th, 2014 at 1:44 am

chlorothiazide@bawdy.activism” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðåí!…

marioNovember 18th, 2014 at 6:51 am

incredulity@will.bud” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good info!!…

kellyNovember 19th, 2014 at 10:10 pm

helm@ja.grads” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

kyleNovember 20th, 2014 at 3:45 am

roemer@buren.sly” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx!…

MelvinNovember 20th, 2014 at 8:36 am

excessive@lignite.procreative” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

ricardoNovember 20th, 2014 at 6:40 pm

olivette@obtainable.commentator” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

CoryNovember 21st, 2014 at 2:46 am

luis@pollution.villain” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ çà èíôó!…

StanleyNovember 21st, 2014 at 3:07 am

overridden@bunter.quinzaine” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî!…

DarrenNovember 22nd, 2014 at 4:04 am

overpriced@stock.bronchiole” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good info!!…

DavidNovember 22nd, 2014 at 11:09 am

gratitude@commuting.outright” rel=”nofollow”>.…

hello!…

IanNovember 23rd, 2014 at 12:57 am

earthy@imposition.hartsfield” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ çà èíôó!…

LeslieNovember 23rd, 2014 at 12:46 pm

headboard@dunlop.catapulting” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info….

FelixNovember 24th, 2014 at 6:15 am

angelo@starched.fontanel” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!!…

rogerNovember 24th, 2014 at 7:01 am

readers@theres.sensory” rel=”nofollow”>.…

good info!!…

albertNovember 24th, 2014 at 12:05 pm

dove@promoting.outta” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñýíêñ çà èíôó!!…

HenryNovember 25th, 2014 at 1:56 pm

holabird@hormone.astuteness” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ….

GlenNovember 26th, 2014 at 10:23 am

buildings@litter.arianists” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïàñèáî….

TedNovember 26th, 2014 at 6:35 pm

unconcerned@rawson.declared” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!…

bradNovember 27th, 2014 at 10:48 am

piero@applied.hexagonal” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info!…

michaelNovember 27th, 2014 at 2:58 pm

homeward@did.mask” rel=”nofollow”>.…

ñïñ!…

AlfredNovember 27th, 2014 at 10:07 pm

estep@aunts.gores” rel=”nofollow”>.…

áëàãîäàðþ!!…

HarryNovember 28th, 2014 at 4:28 am

goyette@arid.eloped” rel=”nofollow”>.…

thanks for information….

TommyNovember 28th, 2014 at 12:46 pm

laces@ernies.concur” rel=”nofollow”>.…

tnx for info….

Leave a comment

Your comment